![]() ![]() Add rules here for the different types of traffic you want to traverse the vpn. Go to your firewall rules and click on the tab for your OpenVPN interface. Make sure the box is checked on the qDefault one as this will get all the traffic that is unmatched on the VPN interface. I added two queues to my OpenVPN interface. Then go into the traffic shaper configuration. I create an interface for the OpenVPN connection under Interfaces – > Assign So I shape it before going into the tunnel. I found that marking the vpn packets doesn't work, and the VPN is already encrypted on the WAN interface, so there's no way to see the traffic to give it priority. For instance, I downgrade bulk traffic for backups and prioritize higher web and other traffic. I have a site to site OpenVPN connection setup and I like having some traffic have a higher priority than others. Since you cannot establish VPN tunnels from the Sophos interfaces, plus if you are doing something that's going through the internet, then you lose flexibility.Ĭurrently, let's say we have a factory V-LAN and you don't want anybody within the factory V-LAN to be able to connect to another unless it is to a specific V-LAN, and you want to use VPN technology, you can't do it because you can't establish the connection again between two internal interfaces.I'm not familiar with Deluge, however I do shape traffic inside my vpn tunnels. If you want to create, with the zero-trust concept, which is where you don't trust anybody or any device, you want to make sure that everything on your network is segmented and everything is relative, depending on its flexibility, behind its firewall or a firewall segment. At some points, you might want to establish VPNs between certain network segments. When you want to establish a VPN with different wizards, they assume that you're always going through your internet link. There is an area that is very specific to our setup, where working tools you cannot easily establish a VPN between two internal networks. So, that's the best-case scenario that I can explain. So, then when you want to implement this, it's much easier at that time. Then you find someone, they explain it to you then say, "Oh, it only makes sense". Then you have to revert to the internet and go onto newsgroups to try to see if anybody has had your type of experience. If you want to go further into the concept of it, which you know there is, you have nothing. This is where they stop, with nothing more. If you click on the help file, they say a zone is an area where you can define specific logical network areas. For example, when you look up the details on a firewall rule to validate it, the details are not there. ![]() The documentation for implementation is not good. Their training mechanisms are not perfect, and this is where you lose a good appreciation of the product. Training on the devices is an area that needs improvement. The uptake in the market has been wonderful and currently, it's competing with other top firewalls such as Check Point, Fortinet, and Palo Alto. ![]() When you look at Gartner, it's doing well. There's quite a number of items on offer. We've deployed quite a number for our users and our customers, and the feedback is quite positive in terms of management and also administration. Being inbuilt in Sophos, you just have to configure an application so that it's more of a policy, and you're good to go. This is unlike other firewalls, where you have to integrate with another standalone web application firewall. Sophos has the web application firewall inbuilt. In the Sophos firewall, there's deep inspection, which works quite well. When I deploy a firewall, I integrate it with the endpoint so that they can send the security heartbeat from the endpoint to the firewall. ![]() I enjoy synchronized security, where you have to synchronize both the firewall and the endpoint. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Even though it has a modern interface, I like the fact that I can always go into the console and it's a Linux box behind the scene - which is very nice for when you're trying to do very advanced tasks. I was able to figure out some very advanced things. I'd give the product an eight out of ten for a score. I would highly recommend staying away from the other products. I've been working on it for five years and I still catch myself sometimes trying to figure out why a certain rule doesn't work doing this or that. There's going to be a lot of troubleshooting. Definitely take their firewall courses, as there are going to be a lot of tasks that you feel should be easy and they're not. For example, the Sophos Anti-Virus is not worth it. I'd advise those considering this product to stick with it and stay away from the fluff. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |